The submission lacks credibility due to highly exaggerated and unverifiable claims. Specifically, the traction claim that 'most people have used my product' is objectively false for a consultancy firm. The submission confuses 'market cap' with revenue, contains contradictory geographic data (Denmark vs. 'Pvt. Ltd.' which is typical of India/Commonwealth), and provides no specific technical details. The response quality implies either a lack of seriousness or a potential deceptive intent.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline