The project represents a legitimate Vancouver-based initiative addressing the housing crisis through Realtor partnerships and non-profit collaborations (e.g., AHMA). However, the submission itself is of extremely poor quality, containing demonstrable falsehoods ('most people have used my product', 'audience reach: everyone') and confusing financial metrics ('marketcap: 500000'). While the real-world utility and market timing are excellent, the score is heavily penalized by the lack of verifiable proprietary technology (relies on third-party tools like Canibuild) and the exaggerated traction claims in the submission.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline