The submission describes a software agency with a claimed 25-year history, yet the entry is marred by low-quality responses, dubious traction claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product'), and misuse of financial terminology ('marketcap' for a private LLC). While the underlying business likely has real-world B2B utility, the lack of verifiable evidence, the generic 'everyone' audience definition, and the sparse details significantly penalize the score. The project scores in the range of a small but potential SME, heavily discounted for poor presentation.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline