The submission describes a small IT consultancy established in 2012 but lacks verifiable evidence of its claims. Major discrepancies exist between the claimed traction ('most people have used my product') and the reported metrics (Team of 6, ~$500k 'marketcap'). The input provides vague descriptions of 'Big Data' and 'Analytics' without specific case studies or technical details. The response quality is low, with unrealistic audience definitions ('everyone') and confusing financial data, resulting in a low score driven by lack of credibility and substance.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline