The submission references a legitimate and historically significant ophthalmic incubator (ForSight Labs), but the data provided is of extremely low quality and contains demonstrably false claims. While the real-world entity has high utility and successful exits, the submission claims 'most people have used my product' (factually incorrect for specialized medical implants) and lists 'everyone' as the audience. The disconnect between the reputable domain and the amateurish, hyperbolic input data results in a very low score, penalizing the lack of verifiable evidence and poor response quality.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline