The project represents 'Forbes', a massive, established legacy media brand with verified global reach (94M+) and high utility in business information. However, the submission quality is extremely low, featuring lazy evidence ('most people have used my product'), vague technical details, and inaccurate financial data ($75M market cap vs actual ~$630M+ valuation). While the entity's intrinsic value and traction provide a high floor for the score, the lack of effort and precision in the submission significantly dampens the potential rating compared to a professionally documented entry.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline