The project refers to 'FlutterFlow', a legitimate and highly successful low-code development platform with significant market traction and utility. However, the submission data provided is of extremely low quality, featuring hyperbolic claims ('most people have used my product'), vague definitions ('audience: everyone'), and confusing metrics ('marketcap: 17000000'). While the underlying entity is strong (potentially scoring 700+ with proper evidence), the 'Quality Factor' penalties for vague and unsupported claims in this specific submission significantly reduce the final score to the 400 range.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline