The submission for 'Fluna' (StarKeeper) lacks verifiable evidence and contains significant red flags. The project description is contradictory (claiming both 'App Dev Tools' and 'Treasury Analytics'), and the audience reach claim ('everyone') suggests a lack of market focus. Most critically, the traction claim ('most people have used my product') is demonstrably false for an unindexed project with no digital footprint. The response quality is extremely low, with empty fields and incoherent data (e.g., 'all time marketcap: null'). As per the evaluation criteria, projects with false claims and no verifiable traction receive a score below 0.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline