Proof of Usefulness Report

Fluna

Analysis completed on 1/21/2026

-3
Proof of Usefulness Score
Lab Mode

The submission for 'Fluna' (StarKeeper) lacks verifiable evidence and contains significant red flags. The project description is contradictory (claiming both 'App Dev Tools' and 'Treasury Analytics'), and the audience reach claim ('everyone') suggests a lack of market focus. Most critically, the traction claim ('most people have used my product') is demonstrably false for an unindexed project with no digital footprint. The response quality is extremely low, with empty fields and incoherent data (e.g., 'all time marketcap: null'). As per the evaluation criteria, projects with false claims and no verifiable traction receive a score below 0.

Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?

Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes

View All Reports

Score Breakdown

Real World Utility+1.25
Audience Reach Impact+0.00
Technical Innovation+0.75
Evidence Of Traction-6.25
Market Timing Relevance+1.00
Functional Completeness+0.00
Subtotal-3.25
Usefulness Multiplierx1.0
Final Score-3

Project Details

Project URL
Description
Flunais in the Application Development Tools Industry

Algorithm Insights

Market Position
Early stage requiring focused development
User Engagement
Documented reach suggests active user community
Technical Stack
Modern tech stack aligned with sponsor technologies

Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score

Document User Growth

Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates

Showcase Revenue Model

Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams

Expand Evidence Base

Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation

Technical Roadmap

Share development milestones and feature completion timeline