The project 'Flipsnack' is a verified, established SaaS platform with significant market presence (125 employees, ~$17M implied revenue), corresponding to the 'Much larger scale' calibration tier. However, the submission quality is critically low: the description was copy-pasted from a specific user-created document (European Military Medical Services Journal) rather than the platform itself, and traction claims ('most people have used my product') are hyperbolic and unsupported. The final score is heavily penalized (0.5x Quality Factors) to reflect the poor submission evidence, dragging a potential 600+ score down to the 200s.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline