The submission for Fisecal contains significant red flags, primarily the unverifiable and hyperbolic claim that 'most people have used my product'. There is no evidence of a live product, user base, or revenue. The technical description is generic ('software-development'), and the reach claim ('everyone') is unrealistic. While the problem addressed (financial instability) is valid, the project lacks credibility, detail, and execution evidence.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline