The project 'Fin vs Fin' is a verifiable, established affiliate review site for DTC wellness products, solving a clear consumer problem. However, the submission quality is critically low, containing hyperbolic claims ('most people have used my product'), inconsistent naming ('SwiftWing' vs 'Fin vs Fin'), and zero verifiable metrics. While external knowledge confirms the site's existence and moderate traffic (~100k-300k monthly), the evaluation is heavily penalized for the lack of evidence and professionalism in the input data. The score reflects a legitimate niche business dragged down by a poor Proof of Usefulness submission.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline