The project is identified as Figma, a verified industry-leading design platform with massive real-world utility and adoption (Unicorn/Decacorn scale). However, the submission itself is of extremely low quality, providing vague claims ('everyone', 'most people') and lazy data entry. While the platform's intrinsic value and external verification justify a high score in the 400-700+ range, significant penalties were applied to 'Evidence of Traction' and 'Response Quality' due to the lack of supporting documentation in the application.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline