Farmers Support appears to be a legitimate Japanese SME providing agricultural consulting and IoT solutions (e.g., 'Remote Farm' systems). However, the project submission is of exceptionally low quality, containing verifiable falsehoods regarding traction (claiming 'most people have used my product') and generic, buzzword-heavy descriptions. While the underlying business has real-world utility in the AgTech sector, the lack of verifiable metrics, the hyperbolic claims, and the minimal effort in the application result in a score reflecting a 'minimal traction' or 'poorly substantiated' entry.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline