The submission represents the Faculty of Informatics at Reutlingen University. While the institution itself is established and reputable, the project submission suffers from extremely low quality, characterized by hyperbolic claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product', 'audience reach: everyone') and irrelevant data (e.g., 'all time marketcap'). As a result, despite the verifiable existence of the faculty, the Proof of Usefulness score is heavily penalized for lack of specific verifiable digital traction, unrealistic claims, and the absence of a distinct technological product offering beyond standard educational infrastructure.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline