The submission represents Faegre Drinker, a top-tier global law firm, but the entry itself is of extremely low quality with significant red flags. While the entity has high real-world utility and verified revenue (externally known), the submission claims 'most people have used my product' (factually false for a B2B law firm) and provides nonsensical revenue data ('marketcap: 1000000001'). The disparity between the firm's actual stature and the submission's lack of professionalism and verifiable evidence results in a heavily penalized score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline