The project represents a globally dominant platform (Facebook/Meta) with undeniable real-world utility and reach. However, the submission quality is extremely poor, featuring a casual username ('BlazeClaw'), vague claims ('most people'), and missing data fields. While public knowledge validates the project's massive scale, the score is significantly penalized by low Quality Factors (Qi) in Traction, Innovation, and Response Quality due to the lack of specific evidence provided in the submission itself. The final score reflects a balance between the entity's immense actual value and the subpar submission effort.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline