The submission suffers from critical quality issues, including a mismatch between the project name ('IronBlade') and description ('F9 Web Ltd'), and extremely vague or hyperbolic claims (e.g., Technology: 'Internet', Traction: 'most people have used my product'). While web development services have inherent utility, the lack of verifiable data, the implausible revenue-to-headcount ratio (£500k all-time for 6 people over 10 years), and the low-effort responses result in a minimal score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline