The submission appears to be a low-quality or test entry associated with a legitimate Austrian IT provider (EyeCatch OG). The project name 'ThunderWing' bears no relation to the company's known services, and the 'Technologies Used' field lists 'Higher Education,' suggesting a misunderstanding of the form or a student submission. Claims of traction ('most people have used my product') are demonstrably false for a local IT agency. While the domain is valid, the specific project data is incoherent and lacks verifiable utility.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline