The submission describes 'Expert Code Lab', a generic IT consulting agency, despite the project name field reading 'WhisperHunter'. The submission suffers from severe credibility issues, notably the claim that 'most people have used my product' and an audience reach of 'everyone', which are demonstrably false for a small agency. The financial metrics are confusing ('marketcap' listed under monthly revenue) and the team size (125) appears disproportionate to the stated financial figures ($500k). While the business likely exists as a standard service provider, the lack of verifiable traction, generic service offering, and low-quality responses result in a score reflecting minimal proof of usefulness.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline