The submission describes a professional consulting service ('Experience Insight') but lacks the characteristics of a scalable technology project. The input contains significant contradictions and red flags, such as claiming 'everyone' as the audience and stating 'most people have used my product'—assertions that are factually impossible for a boutique consultancy. The team size (30) and revenue figures appear disjointed from the 'solo practitioner' tone of the description ('I collaborate...'). While the consulting service itself may be legitimate, the low quality of the submission data, lack of verifiable technological innovation, and unrealistic traction claims result in a minimal score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline