The submission lacks credibility due to demonstrably false claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product') and vague inputs. The description is buzzword-heavy with no evidence of a functional product, custom technology, or active user base. The revenue field is misused for a 'marketcap' figure, suggesting a lack of business metrics. Overall, the project appears to be a placeholder or low-effort entry with no verifiable utility or traction.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline