The submission for 'Exacta' presents a significant contradiction. While 'exacta.cl' corresponds to a legitimate Chilean construction materials company (ICF technology) with potential real-world utility, the submission itself is of extremely low quality, containing garbage text (a long string of numbers), hyperbolic claims ('everyone', 'most people'), and unverifiable data. The 'GoldenFang' username and lack of serious detail act as red flags, severely penalizing the score despite the underlying business's likely validity. The evaluation reflects the failure of the submission to provide credible proof of usefulness.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline