The submission for 'EXA Finance' contains significant contradictions and unverifiable claims. While the URL points to a legitimate DeFi NFT marketplace on the Algorand blockchain, the business type is listed as 'AI search infrastructure' (confusing it with exa.ai), and the technology list includes 'construction,' suggesting a low-quality or automated submission. Claims of reaching 'everyone' and 'most people' having used the product are factually incorrect. The revenue metric is presented as an unrealistic market cap figure without context. The score is heavily penalized for poor response quality and lack of credible evidence.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline