The submission for EvidentLaw lacks verifiable data and contains significant red flags. The claim that "most people have used my product" is demonstrably false for an obscure legal tech brand with no search footprint. The description contains typos, the audience is defined as "everyone" (unrealistic for legal tech), and no specific technology is listed. The project appears to be a placeholder or low-effort entry with no evidence of real-world utility or traction.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline