The submission appears to be a low-quality or test entry. While it describes a legitimate institution (Escola Politècnica Superior at the University of Lleida), the data provided contains significant red flags: conflicting project names ('Etsea' vs 'DeepForge'), verifiable falsehoods regarding traction ('most people have used my product'), and nonsensical financial figures. As a technology project submission, it lacks distinct value proposition, technical details, or credible evidence of innovation beyond the general existence of the university school.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline