The submission appears to be spam or a low-effort contest entry rather than a verifiable technology project. The URL provided is a generic shortener linking to a 'concours' (contest), unrelated to the project title 'Ethical Sourcing Review'. Claims regarding audience reach ('everyone') and traction ('most people have used my product') are factually impossible and unverifiable. The team size and revenue figures lack credibility given the absence of a functional product page or digital footprint.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline