The project submission presents a significant identity conflict: the Name field ('SwiftForge') contradicts the URL and Description, which describe 'ET Works', an established UK-based IT consultancy. While ET Works is a verifiable business with 30 years of history and legitimate clients (e.g., Science Museum Group), the submission itself is of extremely low quality. Claims such as 'most people have used my product' and an audience of 'everyone' are demonstrably false for a B2B MSP. The score reflects the real-world utility of the underlying business (ET Works) but is heavily penalized for the inaccurate and hallucinated submission details.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline