The submission conflates two distinct companies: Esper.com (GovTech Policy) and Esper.io (DevOps for Edge Devices). The evaluation focuses on Esper.com as indicated by the URL, Description, and Email domain. While the submission data was of extremely poor quality (erroneous business type, falsified traction claims like 'most people', and nonsensical revenue), external verification confirms Esper.com is a legitimate, venture-backed (8VC) platform with significant state government contracts (e.g., Tennessee, California). The project has high real-world utility and verified B2G traction, which salvages the score despite the erratic submission.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline