The project appears to be a personal or student prototype hosted on a free Netlify subdomain, lacking commercial infrastructure or a custom domain. The submission contains significant credibility issues, specifically the claim that 'most people have used my product,' which is factually incorrect. The technology section lists non-technical terms ('leadership'), and the description is generic without specific feature details. There is no verifiable evidence of traction, revenue, or a user base.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline