The project 'ThunderBlade' (linked to Enzoic.com) represents a legitimate, established cybersecurity company with ~19 employees and verifiable B2B traction (partnerships, integrations). However, the submission quality is extremely poor, featuring a likely incorrect project name, lazy audience claims ('everyone'), and unverifiable traction statements ('most people have used my product'). While the underlying business is solid and comparable to the calibration baseline (SME with revenue), the score is penalized heavily for the lack of direct evidence provided and the low effort of the response.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline