The submission for EngbeddeX appears to be extremely low quality, containing contradictory information (listing Civil Engineering technologies for an Electrical Engineering project) and hyperbolic, unverifiable claims (claiming 'most people' have used a niche product). The revenue field cites 'marketcap', suggesting a possible token or crypto project without established utility. With no verifiable traction, a lack of clear problem-solution fit, and a generic 'everyone' target audience, the project scores near zero on the Proof of Usefulness scale.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline