The submission describes 'Energise Resources', a legitimate UK-based non-profit network founded in 2018 that connects tech leaders with charities (e.g., War Child, Help for Heroes). However, the submission quality is critically poor, featuring significant data integrity issues: the project name 'StarFang' appears to be a user handle or unrelated reference, and the traction claim ('most people have used my product') is a demonstrable falsehood that triggers a heavy penalty. While the underlying initiative has high social utility, the lack of a proprietary technology product (it is a service/consulting model) and the invalid financial metrics ('marketcap 2500000') limit the score. The evaluation recognizes the real-world value of the entity but penalizes the submission for inaccuracies.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline