The project is a legitimate B2B agency (Employer Branding Australia) providing consulting services, not a technology product. While the business has verified clients (e.g., Optus, Qld Gov) and revenue, the submission data is heavily flawed: it lists a 'DeepHunter' project name (mismatch), exaggerates team size (claimed 125 vs. real ~20), and provides nonsensical traction claims ('most people have used my product'). As a non-tech service entry with poor data integrity, it scores low on the Proof of Usefulness scale designed for technology assessment.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline