The project represents an established embedded design consultancy (Embedded Designer) with verifiable web presence and recent content. However, the submission suffers from significant quality issues, including hyperbolic claims ('most people have used my product', audience is 'everyone') that contradict the niche B2B nature of the services. There is a notable discrepancy between the team size claimed in the submission (6) and the website (100+), and the revenue metric provided is ambiguous ('all time marketcap: 500000'). While the core services are technically useful, the lack of verifiable external traction signals and the poor quality of the submission data result in a low score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline