+2
Proof of Usefulness Score
You're In Business
The submission contains critical red flags, including hyperbolic and unverifiable traction claims ('most people have used my product'). The project description is extremely vague, listing 'leadership' as a technology, and lacks any concrete evidence of existence, revenue, or user base. The submission appears to be a test entry or spam, offering negligible proof of usefulness.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
View All Reports
Score Breakdown
Real World Utility+1.25
Audience Reach Impact+0.0
Technical Innovation+0.0
Evidence Of Traction+0.0
Market Timing Relevance+0.5
Functional Completeness+0.25
Subtotal+2
Usefulness Multiplierx1.10
Final Score+2
Project Details
Project URL
Description
Embed Workflowis in the Business Process Management Software Industry
Algorithm Insights
Market Position
Growing utility with room for optimization
User Engagement
Documented reach suggests active user community
Technical Stack
Modern tech stack aligned with sponsor technologies
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline