The submission for Emaww presents significant red flags, primarily the unsubstantiated and hyperbolic claim that 'most people have used my product' without any supporting metrics. Despite a claimed launch in 2016 and a team of 13, there is no evidence of revenue or significant user adoption. The technology tag 'writing-and-editing' contradicts the 'Emotion AI' description, suggesting a low-quality response. The project scores extremely low due to lack of verifiable traction, confusing categorization, and poor evidence quality.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline