The project 'ELEKS' represents a legitimate, large-scale global software consultancy with over 2,000 employees and a 30-year history, indicating immense real-world utility and traction. However, the submission itself is of low quality, featuring vague claims (e.g., audience reach 'everyone', evidence 'most people have used my product') and missing financial data. While the verifiable entity warrants a high score based on its market position and team size, the 'Response Quality' and 'Audience Reach' scores are heavily penalized due to the unprofessional and lazy nature of the input data.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline