The submission contains significant contradictions and unverifiable claims indicative of low credibility or spam. The description references a specific 'EU-funded ELEGANT project' for IoT software, which conflicts with the provided URL ('elegantprojects.com.au', likely a construction entity) and the 'Construction' technology tag. Furthermore, the traction claim that 'most people have used my product' is factually impossible for a single-person team with no visible market presence. The submission fails to provide coherent evidence of utility, innovation, or existence.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline