The project appears to be a small, regional consultancy firm (eHealthCompany B.V.) rather than a scalable technology product. The submission contains demonstrably false claims, such as 'most people have used my product' and an audience reach of 'everyone', which severely damages credibility. While the entity has existed since 2014, there is no digital footprint for a specific product named 'StarWalker', and the financial metrics are ambiguous. The project scores low due to a lack of verifiable traction, exaggerated reach claims, and a mismatch between the 'product' submission format and the actual service-based business model.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline