The project represents a legitimate niche educational platform for bodywork professionals established in 2011. However, the submission quality is extremely poor, featuring hyperbolic and demonstrably false claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product', 'audience: everyone'). The reported revenue/market cap figure is confusing and suggests either negligible financial success over 13 years or a misunderstanding of metrics. While the website exists and has content, the submission fails to provide credible evidence of meaningful traction or impact.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline