The submission references a highly authoritative domain (egypt.travel), likely the official tourism portal for Egypt. However, the submission content is of extremely low quality, featuring hyperbolic claims ('most people have used my product'), vague descriptions ('All updated technologies'), and nonsensical metrics (launch date 1922, 'marketcap' for a government ministry). While the underlying entity has significant real-world utility and reach, the specific project submission fails to provide verifiable evidence or professional detail, resulting in maximum penalties via the Quality Factors.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline