The project submission contains significant red flags and contradictory information. While the description outlines a high-value service connecting the NHS and Henry M. Jackson Foundation, the supporting data is highly unrealistic. The claim that 'most people have used my product' is demonstrably false for a specialized B2B consultancy. Additionally, a stated 'all time marketcap' of 50,000 is incompatible with a 30-person team operating since 2012. The tags (Financial Services, Real Estate) contradict the Life Science description. Due to these credibility issues and lack of verifiable traction, the Proof of Usefulness score is minimal.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline