The project represents a registered Dutch legal entity (Edoctors B.V.) with verifiable past funding (~$1.8M according to Pitchbook), which lends it some legitimacy. However, the submission is critically flawed. The claimed 'marketcap' of 2.5M appears to be a valuation figure mislabeled as monthly revenue. The traction claim that 'most people have used my product' is demonstrably false and hyperbolic for a niche B.V. with no significant search footprint. The primary domain provided (edoctor.nl) appears to have little to no public content or indexable pages, contradicting the claim of serving 'everyone' including consumers. The submission quality is extremely low, with vague answers and missing data.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline