The submission represents a legitimate traditional law firm (Ecovis Ježek) rather than a technology project. The entry contains significant red flags, including verifiably false traction claims ('most people have used my product') and exaggerated audience reach ('everyone'). While the underlying business exists and provides useful legal services, the submission fails to demonstrate technical innovation, verifiable growth metrics, or relevance within a technology evaluation framework. The low score reflects the lack of technical utility and the poor quality of the response data.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline