The submission describes a legacy digital marketing agency (founded 2004) but contains critical red flags and unverifiable data. The claims of audience reach ('everyone') and traction ('most people have used my product') are demonstrably false for a 6-person boutique agency. The revenue metric is confused ('all time marketcap'), and the project lacks any technological innovation. The low-quality, hyperbolic submission strongly suggests either a lack of seriousness or a misunderstanding of the evaluation criteria.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline