The submission references a legitimate brand (eComEngine) but contains critically low-quality and objectively false data (e.g., claiming 'most people' have used a B2B Amazon seller tool). The technical section ('Internet') and traction evidence are non-existent or nonsensical, suggesting a spam, low-effort, or unverified submission. The project receives a minimal score solely based on the existence of the referenced software, heavily penalized for lack of proof and red flags.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline