The project represents a legacy IT services company (est. 2003) rather than a scalable technology product. While the business likely exists, the submission contains significant red flags: claiming 'everyone' as the audience, citing obsolete technology ('Flash demos'), and making demonstrably false traction claims ('most people have used my product'). The 'marketcap' figure is ambiguous and likely conflates revenue with valuation. There is no evidence of recent innovation or significant market impact.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline