The submission for 'Easy Gigs' lacks credible evidence and contains highly exaggerated claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product'). The description is generic with no specific details on functionality or technology. The 'marketcap' figure is ambiguous and misplaced in the revenue field. With a 2017 launch date and a team of 6, the lack of verifiable traction and the poor quality of the response result in a minimal score, indicating a project with either no real-world footprint or significant credibility issues.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline