The submission is characterized by extremely low-quality data and hyperbolic, unverifiable claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product' and target audience is 'everyone'). While the URL points to a standard proposal management tool, the submission fails to provide any concrete technologies, metrics, or differentiation. The lack of serious engagement with the evaluation criteria and the presence of false traction signals result in a negligible score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline