The project 'Djamu' appears to be a legitimate but early-stage social enterprise focused on upcycling bottle caps in Indonesia, confirmed by the existence of djamu.com.au. However, the submission itself contains severe red flags that drastically reduce the score. Claims such as 'audience reach: everyone' and 'most people have used my product' are demonstrably false for a niche furniture brand. The revenue figure uses incorrect terminology ('marketcap') and provides an ambiguous number. While the mission has high real-world utility, the lack of verifiable traction and the poor quality of the submission (e.g., user name 'IronFang', hyperbolic claims) result in a score reflecting minimal proven usefulness.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline